Blogroll / Design strategy

Why is the brand architecture needed?

Every brand manager should be familiar with four basic strategies and nine sub-strategies of brand architecture. With brand architecture companies specify the brands roles and the nature of relationships between brands. The brand relationship spectrum is a tool that offers companies to design a new offering without risking image dilution.

Aaker and Joachimsthaler define brand architecture as an organizing structure of the brand portfolio that specifies brand roles and the nature of relationships between brands (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000, p. 8). Others see brand architecture more general as an integrated process of brand building through establishing brand relationships in the competitive environment (Rajagopal and Sanchez, 2004, p. 233). And the main reason why would an organization need the brand architecture seems to be the definitions of the companies brand or brands and their description (Bernstein, 2006, p. 13).

One of the most powerful tools in a well develop brand architecture is the brand relationship spectrum as presented by Aaker and Joachimsthaler (figure  below). Without this powerful tool the “new offering of companies would be limited largely to either building a new brand (an expensive and difficult proposition) or extending an existing brand (and thereby risk image dilution).” (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000, p. 10). This is why the brand architecture is needed in the companies.

A seen in the figure below we are able to differentiate four basic brand strategies and nine substrategies in the brand relationship strategies. Companies most understand each of these strategies if they hope to design effective brand strategies (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000, p. 10).

Figure: Brand Relationship Spectrum with examples

brand relationship spectrum

Brand relationship spectrum with examples.

Figure source: Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000, p. 9

Aaker, David A. and Joachimsthaler, Erich. 2000. The Brand Relationship Spectrum: The Key to the Brand Architecture Challenge. California Management Review: 42/4, p. 8-23.
Bernstein, Laurence. 2006. Scaling Mt. Logo. Marketing Magazine: 111/4, p. 13.
Rajagopal and Sanchez, Romulo. 2004. Conceptual analysis of brand architecture and relationships within product categories. Journal of Brand Management: 11/3, p. 233-247.

Marko Savić
I’m raising awareness of the connection of business model innovation with design thinking. Have just published a book on business models design. You may wish to meet me in person at my next workshop or interact with me on Twitter.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

3 thoughts on “Why is the brand architecture needed?

  1. Pingback: 2010 in review « Design ManagementStrategyThinking

  2. Pingback: A Short Introduction to the Steps of the Corporate Identity Audit « Corporate Identity, Design Strategy & Branding

  3. Pingback: Corporate vs. Line Branding « Design & Branding in the Corporations

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s